HOME
click here to return to the main page
Nez Perce
Expedition Culture Geography People Maps Nature
Expedition
  Misconceptions and Misrepresentations
Wetxuuwíis
Twisted Hair and Canoe Camp
"Squaw"


A Lewis and Clark Perspective

William Clark wrote in his journal:

. . . on Tuesday October 9th . . . The Indians and our party were very mery this after noon
a woman faind madness &c. &c. Singular acts of this woman in giveing in Small potions all She had & if they were not received. She would Scarrify her Self in a of horid manner &c . . . .

John Ordway wrote in his journal:

On Wednesday May 28th 1806. . . . we Set out eairly
the old chief and an other Indn went with us. we rode on a plain about 2 hours then left the road and bore South. . .

On Thursday May 29th 1806. . . . . towards evening we arived at the kimooenim or Lewises river (Snake River) at a fishery at a bad rapid. our chief told us to set down and not go in the lodge untill we were invited
so we did at length they invited us in. spread robes for us to sit on and Set a roasted Salmon before us and Some of their white bread which they call uppah. we eat hearty of this fat fish but did not eat 1/4 of it. It was Set up for us. this lodge is about 100 feet long and 20 wide and all in one but they have but fiew Salmon.

On Friday May 30th 1806. . . . . a number of [Indians?] left this eairly with nearly all the Salmon which was caught so we had to wait here to day expecting to git some Salmon
the natives roasted an other Salmon & Set before us to eat. in the afternoon we purchased as many Salmon as we thought was necessary to take home and hung them up
the most they catch is on the opposite shore along the rocks in the whorls & eddys. we Saw only three dip nets at 3 places a fishing . . . .

On Saturday May 31st 1806. . . . Some of the young Indians Stole Some of our fish and went away in the night. . . . .

Jefferson Peace Medal

When the peoples of two so very distinct cultures collide, as they did on the Uyayp (Weippe) prairie during the time of Q'emes (camas) digging, misconceptions and misrepresentations are likely to follow.

For the Nimíipuu, they would ask who were these strange creatures, foul of smell, with blue eyes, many with upside down heads (bald on top with hairy beards below), and one whose skin color was as dark as night? While the prophecies had long told of the coming of the soyaapo (white men), would they simply pass through or stay, and, if they settled, would they bring strife or benefit to the Nimíipuu? Already there was great and substantiated misgivings with the winds of change, with so many children and elders dying of unknown illnesses, yet powerful rifles and other metal tools already found their way among the Nimíipuu. When these strangers first appeared, the Nimíipuu already had traded for and acquired rifles, and were most appreciative of the gun powder and lead balls given by Lewis and Clark. Future trading benefits could be initiated. But it was only in the words of the old woman, Wetxuwiss, that the strangers were saved.


Click Here to get RealPlayer 28K 56K 256K
HTML Transcript
Listen, as Allen Pinkham discusses some of the misconceptions concerning the Corps of Discovery's experience with the Nimíipuu. In this clip, on knowing of the coming of Lewis and Clark long before their arrival. (Interviewed by Josiah Pinkham in November 2001)

For the Corps of Discovery, their mission was a commercial, scientific and military expedition. Due to the nature of their mission and their cultural background, Lewis and Clark viewed the landscape, or wilderness, as something to be conquered, tamed, or put to use. Thus, their conception of the landscape was primarily seen through political, scientific and economical eyes. These military-trained men were to locate and chart a direct water route across America in order "to extend the external commerce" of the United State. Knowledge of the Indian inhabitants was to be obtained to secure a peace and initiate commerce with them. With their keen eyes for scientific observation, Lewis and Clark were to identify and collect samples of the many plant and animal species they come across, and to chart the natural geography and geology of the land. And in their discovery, maps were to be drawn, and names were to be given to the places and routes through the landscape. The expedition's writings about the Clearwater Valley described the landscape in terms of measurements, physical characteristics, and resources available. However, this does not imply that the expedition lacked respect for the landscape or failed to appreciate the beauty that surrounded them. The land of the Chop pun-nish would be only one of many Indian lands identified and mapped and named and commercially secured for the westwardly expanding United States.

Click Here to get RealPlayer 28K 56K 256K
HTML Transcript
Listen, as Allen Pinkham discusses a misrepresentation of the "madness" in a woman's actions. (Interviewed by Josiah Pinkham in November 2001)

In the process, the men of the Corps of Discovery would call the Nimíipuu women "Squar", (squaws) and some of their band headmen, "chiefs". The imposition of the political office "chief" by the missionaries would be later used to help control people. Both these terms would misrepresent and lead to anguish. The actions of redistributing the food would be called a theft, as the "young Indians Stole Some of our fish and went away in the night. . . . ." (See Ordway journal entry May 31st in the side bar and Allen Pinkham's interview below.)

Would these strangers, as they passed in the canoes that the Nimíipuu helped them fashion, see Coyote's Fishnet or the Ant and Yellowjack in the hillsides of the Clearwater? Would they know of the Animal Peoples who formed and gave life to this land? Would these strangers follow the cycles of the seasons, moving with the salmon runs and the camas blooms? Would these strangers understand the ethic of sharing and the role the salmon headmen in overseeing that no one in the community went hungry? And would these strangers seek their guidance by fasting on the high mountain ridges? Would these strangers see themselves as an integral and inseparable part of the landscape itself, and view the surrounding topography as being spiritually endowed, a sacredness embodied in all things? Would Lewis and Clark appreciate that generations upon generations, since time immemorial, have resided in this same location, developing a strong sense of place. Or would this landscape and its many peoples mean something all together different to Lewis and Clark and those who would follow?

Click Here to get RealPlayer 28K 56K 256K
HTML Transcript
Allen Pinkham discusses John Ordway's experience with salmon and his misinterpretation of a "Cho pun-nish theft." (Interviewed by Josiah Pinkham in November 2001)

© Nez Perce Tribe 2002

< previous | next >